34 research outputs found

    Disease mechanism for retinitis pigmentosa (RP11) caused by missense mutations in the splicing factor gene PRPF31

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Missense mutations in the splicing factor gene PRPF31 cause a dominant form of retinitis pigmentosa (RP11) with reduced penetrance. Missense mutations in PRPF31 have previously been shown to cause reduced protein solubility, suggesting insufficiency of functional protein as the disease mechanism. Here we examine in further detail the effect of the A216P mutation on splicing function. Methods: Splicing activity was assayed using an in vivo assay in transfected mammalian cells with rhodopsin (RHO) and transducin (GNAT1) splicing templates. Pull-down assays were used to study the interaction between PRPF31 and one of its cognate partners in the spliceosome, PRPF6. Results: Splicing of RHO intron 3 and GNAT1 introns 3-5 mini-gene templates was inefficient with both spliced and unspliced products clearly detected. Assays using the RHO minigene template revealed a direct negative effect on splicing efficiency of the mutant. However, no effect of the mutation on splicing efficiency could be detected using the longer GNAT1 minigene template or using a full-length RHO transcript, splicing of which had an efficiency of 100%. No unspliced RHO transcripts could be detected in RNA from human retina. Pull-down assays between PRPF31 and PRPF6 proteins showed a stronger interaction for the mutant than wild type, suggesting a mechanism for the negative effect. Conclusions: Splicing of full-length RHO is more efficient than splicing of the minigene, and assays using a full-length template more accurately mimic splicing in photoreceptors. The RP11 missense mutations exert their pathology mainly via a mechanism based on protein insufficiency due to protein insolubility, but there is also a minor direct negative effect on function

    Development and application of a next-generation-sequencing (NGS) approach to detect known and novel gene defects underlying retinal diseases

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Inherited retinal disorders are clinically and genetically heterogeneous with more than 150 gene defects accounting for the diversity of disease phenotypes. So far, mutation detection was mainly performed by APEX technology and direct Sanger sequencing of known genes. However, these methods are time consuming, expensive and unable to provide a result if the patient carries a new gene mutation. In addition, multiplicity of phenotypes associated with the same gene defect may be overlooked.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To overcome these challenges, we designed an exon sequencing array to target 254 known and candidate genes using Agilent capture. Subsequently, 20 DNA samples from 17 different families, including four patients with known mutations were sequenced using Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx next-generation-sequencing (NGS) platform. Different filtering approaches were applied to identify the genetic defect. The most likely disease causing variants were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Co-segregation and sequencing analysis of control samples validated the pathogenicity of the observed variants.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The phenotype of the patients included retinitis pigmentosa, congenital stationary night blindness, Best disease, early-onset cone dystrophy and Stargardt disease. In three of four control samples with known genotypes NGS detected the expected mutations. Three known and five novel mutations were identified in <it>NR2E3, PRPF3, EYS, PRPF8, CRB1, TRPM1 </it>and <it>CACNA1F</it>. One of the control samples with a known genotype belongs to a family with two clinical phenotypes (Best and CSNB), where a novel mutation was identified for CSNB. In six families the disease associated mutations were not found, indicating that novel gene defects remain to be identified.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In summary, this unbiased and time-efficient NGS approach allowed mutation detection in 75% of control cases and in 57% of test cases. Furthermore, it has the possibility of associating known gene defects with novel phenotypes and mode of inheritance.</p

    The CXC-Chemokine CXCL4 Interacts with Integrins Implicated in Angiogenesis

    Get PDF
    The human CXC-chemokine CXCL4 is a potent inhibitor of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Considering that CXCL4 is sequestered in platelet α-granules and released following platelet activation in the vicinity of vessel wall injury, we tested the hypothesis that CXCL4 might function as a ligand for integrins. Integrins are a family of adhesion receptors that play a crucial role in angiogenesis by regulating early angiogenic processes, such as endothelial cell adhesion and migration. Here, we show that CXCL4 interacts with αvβ3 on the surface of αvβ3-CHO. More importantly, human umbilical vein endothelial cells adhere to immobilized CXCL4 through αvβ3 integrin, and also through other integrins, such as αvβ5 and α5β1. We further demonstrate that CXCL4-integrin interaction is of functional significance in vitro, since immobilized CXCL4 supported endothelial cell spreading and migration in an integrin-dependent manner. Soluble CXCL4, in turn, inhibits integrin-dependent endothelial cell adhesion and migration. As a whole, our study identifies integrins as novel receptors for CXCL4 that may contribute to its antiangiogenic effect

    Characterization of the test sample set.

    No full text
    <p>A) Samples from previously reported patients with Alu insertion in <i>MAK</i> exon 9 [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0142614#pone.0142614.ref021" target="_blank">21</a>] and control samples were PCR amplified to detect homozygous alleles for Alu insertion and WT alleles. B) Sequence of the inserted element (280 bp Alu, 54 bp poly-A and 13 bp duplication of exon 9 sequence). C) Sanger sequence of the exon 9 Alu insertion breakpoints.</p

    Identification of Homozygous and Heterozygous <i>MAK</i>-Alu Insertions in a Discovery Sample Set.

    No full text
    <p>Identification of Homozygous and Heterozygous <i>MAK</i>-Alu Insertions in a Discovery Sample Set.</p

    Specificity and Sensitivity of <i>In Silico</i> Method to Detect the <i>MAK</i>-Alu insertion.

    No full text
    <p>Specificity and Sensitivity of <i>In Silico</i> Method to Detect the <i>MAK</i>-Alu insertion.</p
    corecore